Astros: Examining the real issues in the sign stealing controversy

What do the official rules actually say?

There is so much confusion out there about what is and what isn’t allowed, so let’s get the rules straight about what, when, and how is it legal or illegal to “steal signs,” according to the rules.

First of all, there is no rule prohibiting the stealing of signs. It’s actually a common and generally accepted practice in the game, and it has been for decades. Even Ty Cobb wrote in 1926 that, “If a player is smart enough to solve the opposing system of signals he is given due credit.”

To expand on that, Dave Campbell wrote:

“However, it is fair game to steal signs from second. The runner at second can look in at the catcher’s signals in an attempt to decipher what the catcher is calling, or he can lean in to determine the location of the pitch. While standing on second base, veteran ballplayers can subtly pass the information they decipher along to the hitter. This is simply considered gamesmanship — no one would think of it as cheating.”

The dividing line lies in the use of mechanical or technological devices to steal signs. Stealing signs with the naked eye is fine, but using additional help is what is frowned upon. The National League banned the use of mechanical devices to steal signs in 1961, and then-MLB Vice President Sandy Alderson issued a memo in 2001 advising teams that the use of electronic equipment to steal signs was prohibited.

In February 2019, Commissioner Rob Manfred circulated a five-page memo enforcing existing sign-stealing rules and outlining new ones, specifically where cameras could be positioned, assigning security experts to monitor team managers who have access to live game feeds for the purposes of challenging a call on the field, and requiring an eight-second delay on all other TV monitors viewed during the game by players and coaches in the bullpen or the clubhouse.

Prior violations.

In 2017, the Boston Red Sox were caught stealing signs against the New York Yankees and relaying them using an Apple Watch, which was not allowed to be in the dugout. To be clear, the Red Sox were fined not for deciphering signs, but because of the use of an electronic means of communicating these signs to each other.

Boston then accused the Yankees of stealing signs using a television camera from the YES television network, which is partially owned by the Yankees. The investigation by MLB did not turn up any evidence to support the allegations made by the Red Sox but instead found evidence of improper use of the dugout phone in an earlier championship prior to 2017. Because the phone was an improper electronic means to communicate, the Yankees were also fined for violation of the rules governing the use of electronics.

Do we have any real evidence of these alleged rule violations?

The common terminology being thrown around is “stealing signs,” but this verbiage makes it sound like some sort of espionage is being committed. In reality, it’s just smart people deciphering a code and then relaying that to their fellow teammates. There’s nothing in the official rules that prohibits this relay. Once again, the only thing prohibited is the use of electronic equipment to communicate with each other during games.

According to the first article published by The Athletic, Mike Fiers, a former pitcher for the Astros, along with three other unnamed sources, alleges that in 2017, the Astros used a camera set up in center field to steal signs from catchers during home games in 2017. The information was then allegedly communicated to a batter by banging loudly on a trash can.

We have a few zealous fans who have put together videos from 2017 in which alleged banging on trash cans and/or different whistles can be heard during specific at-bats by certain players.

According to the clarification issued by Manfred in 2019, which came nearly two years after these alleged violations, the only part of this allegation which may be circumspect is the alleged use of a camera to steal the signs. It would not have been illegal to communicate with the batter using the trashcan because this obviously is not electronic equipment.

There is still no smoking gun here with the timing of these alleged incidents because the rules were not even expanded and clarified by Manfred until 2019, and the Astros were not using an electronic means to communicate with each other.

In a second article from The Athletic, an executive in the front office is alleged to have sent an email to scouts requesting they go to games to report findings of what could and could not be seen of the opposing dugout during games. In and of itself, there is nothing too terribly wrong with this request. This still does not violate the rules because it was advanced scouting and does not prove equipment was used to electronically communicate with players during a game. All this email really proves is the Astros are diligent in finding that competitive edge.

Some things just don’t add up.

Obviously, the banging of trash cans, whistling, or even hand signals to communicate with players is not prohibited because it’s not an electronic means of communication. I know I keep repeating myself, but this is where the most “circumstantial” part of all of these allegations comes into play — the alleged camera in the outfield.

We all know that the players (pitchers and batters) all review in-game video after the fact to look at pitches missed, calls made by the umpires, and other legitimate things. This is no secret. In fact, it is often mentioned by broadcasters several times during a game. The rules implemented in 2019 seemingly addressed the coach and player access to these monitors and the eight-second delay time in the feeds to said monitors.

Where is the evidence of the camera that was allegedly installed in the outfield? And if there was a camera that was installed for the purpose of a real-time feed to a monitor inside of the tunnel to the clubhouse, who allegedly installed this equipment? How many people would have had to have known about it? Who installed the monitor before games? Who took it down after games?

Why now? Why two years after the fact? Reportedly, Fiers stated:

“I just want the game to be cleaned up a little bit because there are guys who are losing their jobs because they’re going in there not knowing. We had a lot of young guys with Detroit trying to make a name and establish themselves. I wanted to help them out and say, ‘Hey, this stuff really does go on. Just be prepared.'”

Why not come forward before going to the A’s? What has gotten into Fiers to make him suddenly grow a conscience?

More from Climbing Tal's Hill

• Just how much better is the Houston Astros playoff rotation than the rest?
• Houston Astros: A Lineup Change to Spark Offense
• Astros prospect Hunter Brown throws 6 shutout innings in debut
• Always faithful Astros World Series champion Josh Reddick defends the title
• Michael Conforto declines Astros’ 2-year, $30 million offer

How is MLB going to investigate all of this? If they find anything that violates the rules as they stood in 2017, how are they going to handle it in relation to the rules of 2019, and in relation to the punishments that were dealt to the Red Sox and Yankees?

As the owners meetings were beginning, Jeff Passan of ESPN reported comments made by Manfred after he toured Globe Life Field in Arlington:

“Right now, we are focused on the information that we have with respect to the Astros. I’m not going to speculate on whether other people are going to be involved. We’ll deal with that if it happens, but I’m not going to speculate about that. I have no reason to believe it extends beyond the Astros at this point in time. “I’m not going to speculate on what the appropriate discipline is. That depends on how the facts are established at the end of the investigation. The general warning I issued to the clubs, I stand by. It certainly could be all of those [past disciplinary actions], but my authority under the major league constitution would be broader than those things as well.”

One thing is for sure — MLB had better do this investigation right. At any rate, it is probably going to be a minute or two before we have a resolution to this issue, and hopefully before the 2020 season gets underway.

In the meantime, can we just get back to the game, please? No matter who you root for, at the end of the day, everything is better with baseball!

For me and my house, though, we’re rooting for the Astros to #BringitHome in 2020!