Jim Johnson (Joy R. Absalon-USA TODAY Sports)

Orioles Are Making Jim Johnson Available

The Houston Astros need a closer. I’m not sure that I can be more blunt than that.

Not even just a closer, but essentially a brand new bullpen. That is what happens when your team leads the league with 29 blown saves. There are plenty of other advanced statistics that back up how bad the bullpen was and the games that it cost the Astros in 2013, but that is in the past. Quite frankly, none of that matters if Jeff Luhnow upgrades the stable of relievers that Bo Porter can call upon in 2014.

Peter Moylan, who was invited to Spring Training on a minor league contract is a start. Same with Raul Valdes and Darin Downs — regardless of my thoughts as to whether they should be on the 40-man roster. But they are just a start. The tip of the proverbial iceberg if you would. While the possibility is there for all three to be solid contributors, there is still more work to be done. At the same time, there are some young pieces like Josh Fields and Kevin Chapman that should not be discounted.

But I’m not sure that Jim Johnson is the answer.

Baltimore has put their All-Star closer on the trade market for obvious reasons. Johnson has had his share of success over the last few seasons, but he very quickly is getting expensive. And for the same reasons why the Orioles would entertain trading Johnson, I do not think pursuing him would be prudent.

Johnson is not your stereotypical closer just based on the fact that he does not throw hard. The 30-year old only struck out 41 batters in 68.2 innings in 2012 and followed that up with 56 strikeouts over 70.1 innings last season. But he did save 51 and 50 games respectively the last two years. And both seasons, he had an ERA under three (2.49 and 2.94), so what is the problem? Clearly the fact that Johnson is not a strikeout pitcher should not matter.

As a red flag his WHIP did increase in 2013 from 1.02 to 1.28 which caused the jump in ERA. Even though he was temporarily removed from the closer’s role over the summer, it didn’t hamper him that much as he still saved 50 games.

Closers sometimes have a shorter shelf life, and I’m not entirely confident in Johnson’s chances at another 50 save season in 2014, or even 40 saves for that matter.

I wouldn’t be in total objection to the Astros acquiring him, but it just doesn’t make sense at this time. Houston would have to give up prospects, pay him $10 million this season, and then also commit to Johnson long term to make the trade worth while. For a player that I don’t have complete confidence in, it might not be the most prudent move. Plus for a team with so many other weaknesses, that is not the best allocation of funds.

Next Astros Game View full schedule »
Saturday, Aug 3030 Aug6:10Texas RangersBuy Tickets

Tags: Houston Astros Jim Johnson

  • Larry

    Ray, I told Greg Thurston this same story but he didn’t think it would be a bad idea to get Jim Johnson. Well the Astros took a chance on Jose Veras I guess that is why the Astros trade him the Astros had a closer that stay with the Astros. Maybe if the Astros bring back Veras as a set up pitcher & then u have Jim Johnson. Are u could do it the other way put Jim Johnson as a set man then Veras as a closer, the last few years the Astros get a closer they end up trading the player. And if they would start winning they would keep a closer. Remember the Astros had Dave Smith for 11 years, & Joe Sambito for 8 years. So if Jeff Luhnow going after ex Cardinals I still say go after Edward Mujica, or make a trade & get Jason Motte.’

    • Ray_Kuhn_28

      Johnson isn’t a terrible option, I just dont think its wise to give up prospects for a pitcher that I still dont think is a sure thing and will cost $10 million this year and then even more after that.

    • astrosince1975

      Larry, I think you misunderstood my comment. I said “I DON”T think Johnson fits with the Astros rebuild.”

      • Larry

        Sorry about that Greg, I didn’t mean by that. I guess my mind is not working today. I hope we can still be friends. Too much turkey yesterday.

        • astrosince1975

          No problem. Thanks for reading.

  • montyross

    This would go against the philosophy of the new GM,which is building up the farm system for the future